The cash-strapped telco gave its counter comments for the session paper on Licensing Framework and Regulatory Mechanism for Submarine Cable Landing in India floated by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) leisurely final year.

Mumbai: Vodafone Thought has rebutted competitors Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel’s recommendation that there desires to be a financial threshold for entities alive to to location up a cable touchdown location (CLS) in India, saying this type of situation would restrict it to companies with deep pockets and would possibly perchance per chance per chance even lead to a monopoly.
The cash-strapped telco gave its counter comments for the session paper on Licensing Framework and Regulatory Mechanism for Submarine Cable Landing in India floated by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) leisurely final year.
“In our search for, such prerequisites will most productive favour ILDOs with mountainous pockets as they would possess financial backing to uncover stake and dangle subsea resources. It can per chance per chance lead to a monopoly within the ILDO-CLS phase,” Vi acknowledged.
It added that giving motivate to deep pocketed avid gamers on cable touchdown stations and global capacities would lead to “vertical impress squeeze as they would possibly perchance perchance per chance very successfully be in a situation to electrify pricing and availability of such capacities to varied Indian operators”, which in flip would possibly perchance per chance per chance stifle the competitors by pushing out comparatively less financially solid ILDOs.
Each and each Jio and Airtel had prompt that there desires to be a criterion for permitting a certified Global Lengthy-Distance Operator (ILDO)/Web Service Provider (ISP) who desires to location up a CLS and end any submarine global cable in India over its CLS.
“The criteria must include minimal receive payment and retaining a minimal equity proportion (i.e. 10% stake or funding), both straight or circuitously within the proposed submarine cable/consortium,” Airtel acknowledged, adding that this type of qualifying criteria desires to be acceptable prospectively for future cables as the present consortium agreements possess long been closed.
While Jio had now now not requested for the applicant ILDO to possess an funding within the submarine cable contrivance, it did reiterate that the regulator must location some receive payment and experience criteria for eligibility since the applicant would be accountable for establishment and repairs of programs and cable within the territorial jurisdiction of India.
“It is regularly essential to originate particular that that virtually all efficient excessive ILDOs must apply for CLS and this would possibly perchance per chance very successfully be acceptable to introduce extra requirements of receive payment and experience in telecom operations for searching for CLS and linked permissions,” Jio had acknowledged.
Vi, however, has argued that prerequisites of receive payment and funding within the cable contrivance will imply mountainous worth for the ILDOs and even among the present ILDOs having CLS would now now not be in a situation to fulfill and lastly must shut down their CLS operations, successfully killing competitors.
It also pointed out that these criteria will decrease option for consortiums who are investing in laying of submarine cable programs.
- “In our search for, the market entry eligibility has to be saved versatile so that increasingly more operators can join and setup their CLS and supply skill to a quantity of Accumulate admission to and ISP avid gamers,” adding that as long as the applicant ILDOs meet the entire security-linked skills requirements, the licensing, regulatory norms and permission process desires to be saved straightforward to study more participation and healthy competitors
Discussion about this post